The Lajat Workers Win Government Recognition of Their Independent Union , but Company Won’t Recognize It

  January 17, 2006

 

 

 

On January 17 a Mexican Labor Court ordered the Conciliation and Arbitration Board [CAB] of Gomez Palacio Durango to grant immediate union recognition to the Lajat Workers Union, setting an historical precedent as the first independent union to achieve government recognition in the region.

In June the CAB rejected the workers petitions for what’s called a registro of their union. The workers appealed and were rejected again. Finally, another appeal to the Tribunal Superior recognized that their union was indeed legitimate.

Negotiations – at long last

That same day the Lajat workers, their  lawyer Federico O’Reilly and CJM representatives met with the Oscar Gonzalez, President of Lajat and Javier Lara, Corporate Director, to inform them about the union recognition and to demand the workers’ reinstatement.

The workers told them that they knew that Levis had recently given Lajat’s Torreon plant five new orders for three styles of women’s jeans and said that the closed Lajat Gomez Palacio plant could do the laundry parts of production. Lara, said that the plant couldn’t be reopened because water there cost 35 pesos a cubic meter whereas it only cost 2.5 pesos in Torreon . The workers said, “Fine, then reinstate us in the Torreon plant,” but both Gonzalez and Lara said that the law gives them the choice of paying severance instead of reinstating the workers, and they prefer to pay severance because there are not enough orders from retailers in the US .

O”Reilly, the workers’ lawyer argued that if that is so, then Lajat must follow the legal process established in labor law for layoffs due to lack of work and pay 120 days of severance rather than 90 days which Lajat was offering. Of course, Lajat would rather pay severance than be forced to recognize the union.

CJM representatives demanded that Lajat abolish its unconstitutional black list of the workers and said Lajat has two choices: 1) Reinstate the workers and recognize the independent union. If they were to do this CJM would help Lajat establish a new image as a responsible producer which respected human rights rather than a sweatshop, or 2) Don’t reinstate the workers and continue to be seen as a union buster which closes plants to avoid respecting the law and human rights, and a gross violator of Levi’s Code of Conduct.    

Lara denied there was a black list and said they’d pay severance. Lawyer O’Reilley told them that the severance pay owed includes back pay until January 4th and amounts to 4 million pesos (about US $400,000). In addition Lajat owes for workers’ health coverage and housing dues.    Gonzalez and Lara said they would calculate what’s owed themselves and would bring an offer in “middle terms” in a couple of days.

When CJM informed Levi’s Latin America Director that the workers had won the registro for the independent union but that Lajat would not reinstate them and that this violates both Mexican labor law and Levi’s Code, she replied that she was glad that Lajat was talking to the workers.

Meeting with the Governor’s representative

On January 18th the Lajat workers and representatives of CJM, the UNT from Mexico City, members of the Labor, Farmers, Popular, and Indigenous Social Front of the Laguna Region met in Gomez Palacio with Felipe del Rivero, a representative of the state governor demanding the removal of the CAB President. They argued that the tribunal decision was proof that he had sided with the company and its CTM union and did not act in accordance with the labor law. Also they demanded reinstatement of the Lajat workers and respect for their union as the only independent union in la Laguna Region.  The Lajat workers also told Del Rivero that they were black listed even at the state jobs program. Their proof was that several of them had applied for this program but were told by the secretary that they were blacklisted because of Lajat problem.  Del Rivero said he would investigate the black lists on the state job program.

 Next steps

It is urgent that CJM members keep sending letters to Levi’s demanding the workers‘ reinstatement and that Lajat recognize the workers’ independent union, eliminate the black list and to respect labor law and Levi’s code of conduct. [Sample letter below]

 Also send letters to the Governor of Durango demanding that the president of the CAB respect the law by forcing Lajat to recognize the union and freezing Lajat’s assets in the Gomez Palacio plant until the workers receive what is due them. [sample letter below]

Sample letters

Michael Kobori

Vice-President, Global Code of Conduct

Levi Strauss & Co.

MKobori@levi.com

Dear Mr. Kobori:

We learned that the Mexican Superior Tribunal decided in favor of the Lajat workers’ independent union. However, Lajat is refusing to reinstate the workers and recognize the independent union. This is another example of how Lajat persistently violates both Mexican Labor Law and Levi’s Code of Conduct. As US consumers, we asked you what is the meaning of your code of conduct if Levis does not enforce it with its suppliers?

We demand that Levi Strauss produce jeans in accordance with its Code and internationally recognized labor rights and that it require Lajat to respect the Mexican Labor Law by reinstating the workers and recognizing the independent union.

Sincerely,

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sr. Contador Ismael Hernández Deraz

Gobernador del Estado de Durango

Email: parti@durango.gob.mx

Dear Governor Hernandez:

We are aware that the Superior Tribunal decided in favor of the Lajat workers independent union. This is proof that the President of the CAB Javier Cobarruvias sided with Lajat and the CTM official union when he denied the workers’ petitions. Cobarrubias also never set the date to freeze the assets of Lajat. Lajat is refusing to reinstate the workers and to recognize the independent union. Furthermore, Lajat claims it does not have money to pay legally mandated severance pay to the workers. This is another example of Lajat’s Labor Law violations.

You should intervene to guarantee that workers’ rights be respected, that workers be reinstated, and that their independent union be recognized by Lajat.

Sincerely,